From: Alain LaBonté (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 10:54:14 EST
A 22:21 2002-10-29 +0000, Michael Everson a écrit :
>At 15:56 -0600 2002-10-29, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>Is it complaint with Unicode to have a font where a-umlaut has a glyph of
>>a with e above? What about a glyph of a-macron (e.g. a handwriting font
>>for someone who writes a-umlaut that way)?
>Of course it is. Glyphs are informative.
If they are informative, they should inform, not disinform... (;
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 30 2002 - 11:35:51 EST