Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 10:19:04 EST

Next message: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Question: the german umlaut"

Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Is long s a presentation form?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 07:49 -0600 2002-11-11, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:

>4. Use Fraktur math symbols. Cons: I can't think of any, though we'd still
>want to promote consensus among the Biblical studies community on using
>this.

They are used as symbols, not as letters of words, in Biblical
studies texts, so why not?

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Dominikus Scherkl: "RE: Question: the german umlaut"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
In reply to: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Plane 1 maths fraktur in textual apparatus?"
Next in thread: Jim Allan: "Re: Is long s a presentation form?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 11 2002 - 10:59:08 EST