From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 00:23:35 EST
George W Gerrity <ggerrity at dragnet dot com dot au> wrote:
>> SC and TC characters are completely non-unified, unless you want to
>> count the few that are the simplified forms of some character and
>> also the traditional form of some other character.
> That is exactly one point as to why there is no simple solution:
> Simplified and Traditional weren't unified.
I think the logic there is backward. It isn't true that there is no
simple solution because SC and TC weren't unified. Rather, SC and TC
weren't unified because there is no simple solution (among other
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 18 2002 - 01:08:59 EST