Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:18:41 EST

Next message: Joe: "RE: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Exciting new software release!"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John:

Thanks for the very useful info.

I gather, then, that for the vowels in the attached image, you'd consider
these to be ogoneks (and, based on Adam's doc, not well-designed), yes?

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
(See attached file: DogribVowels.png)

Next message: Joe: "RE: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Exciting new software release!"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: ogonek vs. retroflex hook"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 13:03:06 EST