Re: Variant Glyph Display

Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 11:32:31 EDT

  • Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Variant Glyph Display"

    Michael Kaplan wrote on 04/13/2003 01:05:41 PM:

    > While it is certainly possible for the PUA to be important for specific
    > purposes, the needs are usually temporary, as compared to EUDC, which in
    > most cases is never temporary. Thus for every one person cursing the
    > implementation there are several dozen or more who are praising it.

    But it should not be difficult to provide a UI so that users can control
    whether the affected portion of the PUA should have EUDC-related semantics
    or not.

    > EUDC is not as "corporate" thing; it is characters defined by end users.

    But the functionality is being provided by a vendor, not by end users.

    - Peter

    Peter Constable

    Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
    7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
    Tel: +1 972 708 7485

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:32:43 EDT