Re: "default ignorable" posts

From: Christopher John Fynn (
Date: Wed May 28 2003 - 10:12:09 EDT

  • Next message: Pim Blokland: "Re: Dutch IJ, again"

    William Overington wrote:

    > However, it might indeed be that there is no interest in my
    code point
    > allocations, yet that is the chance which I, as an inventor,
    need to take
    > when trying to follow the publication option to get an
    > implemented. It worked for my telesoftware invention however,
    as that
    > invention is now at the centre of digital interactive
    television systems and
    > the word telesoftware is in the Oxford English Dictionary.

    What's inventive about privately allocating some PUA

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 28 2003 - 11:18:23 EDT