From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 09:02:18 EDT
William Overington wrote on 05/30/2003 03:20:51 AM:
> 1. I tried out the validation procedure on the following page.
>
> http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/font7007.htm
>
> This is a not too lengthy web page with just Basic Latin letters. It
will
> not validate. It is not clear to me what I need to add to the page to
get
> it to validate. Could there be some very short guidance notes please...
Now you want the Unicode Consortium to provide user support for W3C
protocols??!! This is utterly off topic.
> 2.. What is the situation if a page is encoded entirely properly as far
as,
> say, using UTF-8 goes, yet also uses Private Use Area characters?
So what? Do we also need a variation of the logo to indicate pages that use
ideographic description sequences? variation selectors?
Not necessary!
> 4. Having recently been told quite strongly by several of the
> non-Sarasvati-but-act-like-they-are-without-a-mandate people
(I must admit i find that funny :-)
Do I need a city ordinance and policeman to ask my neighbor to stop
jack-hammering on into the night?
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 30 2003 - 09:48:25 EDT