Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 12:38:07 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"

    At 12:05 -0400 2003-07-15, John Cowan wrote:
    >Michael Everson scripsit:
    > > >We disunify Glagolitic, and rightly so too. But that does not mean
    >> >that there are not intermediate cases that ought to be unified, and
    >> >without definite criteria, it's hard to know what to do.
    >> Just grok them? :-)
    >Nope, won't work.

    Works for me.

    > > When we get to encoding Samaritan, I guess the proposal will stand by
    >> itself or not.
    >Not if there are no criteria to judge it on that are better than "See, it's

    Well, you are going to have to wait. I do not have time to write a
    proposal on Samaritan right now.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 13:26:07 EDT