From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:38:51 EDT
At 22:21 +0200 2003-07-29, Jony Rosenne wrote:
>With Hebrew, it is not accepted that it is a different Vav - letters
>used as matres lectionis are not distinct from the same letters used
>otherwise. Neither is it accepted that this is a different Holam.
>The only thing established is that this artifact has been used in
>several manuscripts, one of many similar artifacts, to aid the
>understanding of the text. And the correct vehicle to convey such
>artifacts is markup.
Ink dots used to aid the understanding of the text are always encoded
as characters. Markup is the wrong way to handle them. Otherwise we
would write Karlj<fronted>u</fronted>rgen or the like.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 16:24:39 EDT