From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 16:32:00 EDT
At 13:01 -0700 2003-07-30, Peter Kirk wrote:
>On 30/07/2003 12:07, John Cowan wrote:
>>When you say "it", which glyph do you mean? I would like a description
>>of what the two glyphs look like and how they are to be distinguished,
>See the reference glyph for U+FB4B. One form looks like this with
>the dot above further to the left, the other like it with the dot a
>little further to the right. This glyph with the centred dot is a
>compromise between the two.
A picture speaks a thousand words.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 17:10:03 EDT