From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 16:58:30 EDT
On 30/07/2003 13:32, Michael Everson wrote:
> At 13:01 -0700 2003-07-30, Peter Kirk wrote:
>> On 30/07/2003 12:07, John Cowan wrote:
>>> When you say "it", which glyph do you mean? I would like a description
>>> of what the two glyphs look like and how they are to be distinguished,
>> See the reference glyph for U+FB4B. One form looks like this with the
>> dot above further to the left, the other like it with the dot a
>> little further to the right. This glyph with the centred dot is a
>> compromise between the two.
> A picture speaks a thousand words.
Two thousand words for you. The two glyphs from Ezra SIL, and a scan
from BHS showing the two glyphs in context.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 20:54:59 EDT