From: Peter Kirk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:32:24 EST
On 03/01/2004 14:23, Peter Kirk wrote:
> On 03/01/2004 13:37, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>> We can't say from the exhibited uppercase alphabet that this should be a
>> mirrored dotless j or a mirrored soft-dotted j if it is converted to
>> lowercase. So Peter, where did you find this image of an alphabet?
> It's not a mirrored J, ...
The best description I can find of this character's glyph is that it is
an inverted (not rotated) U+0490/0491 (not to be confused with U+0413/0433).
-- Peter Kirk email@example.com (personal) firstname.lastname@example.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 18:59:26 EST