From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Feb 18 2004 - 11:46:22 EST
On 18/02/2004 04:33, Michael Everson wrote:
> At 04:16 -0800 2004-02-18, Peter Kirk wrote:
>> If I find references (e.g. the ones Ken and I have already given)
>> with the rest of the Latin alphabet and other characters used as
>> subscripts in linguistic works, would you add these to your proposal
>> as well?
> This proposal is for Indo-Europeanist characters. There have been many
> proposals for superscript and subscript characters.
OK, but what makes an Indo-Europeanist subscript a different from other
proposed subscript a's?
>> If "no", what makes your subscripts different from and more encodable
>> than my subscripts?
> Nothing? We showed evidence of use. Can you do the same?
Absolutely. See the references Ken has cited, from online documents. See
the one I cited, from a printed book. See innumerable textbooks of
mathematics, physics etc.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 18 2004 - 12:39:07 EST