From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Apr 24 2004 - 21:29:53 EDT
If the officers believw that rather than the UTC that a new committee is
needed to "govern" the repository, then it stands to reason that the Unicode
List is the wrong place for locales.... a separate list for discussions
related to that standard is the most sensible approach.
NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
----- Original Message -----
From: "Asmus Freytag" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <email@example.com>; "Frank Yung-Fong Tang"
Cc: "Unicode List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: Standardize TimeZone ID
> At 05:04 PM 4/24/2004, Mark Davis quoted a message by Frank:
> >I know this is a little bit off-topic for Unicode, just like the one
> >about locale. Maybe I should move this to w3c i18n mailling list
> Now that the common locale data repository is hosted by The Unicode
> Consortium, it may no longer be as off-topic as you think....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 22:01:08 EDT