Re: Standardize TimeZone ID

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Sun Apr 25 2004 - 13:18:48 EDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"

Previous message: Ernest Cline: "[META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Standardize TimeZone ID"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "[locale] mailing lists? (was: Standardize TimeZone ID)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "[locale] mailing lists? (was: Standardize TimeZone ID)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:30 -0700 2004-04-25, Michael \(michka\) Kaplan wrote:

>I find myself in the [rare? <g>] position of agreeing with Michael Everson
>wholeheartedly.

(*embraces MichKa*)

>Seems like those who want to combine them in a huge mishmosh can
>simply belong to both lists, right?

Even I might want to belong to both lists. But I need to thread these
topics into different boxes, and that is best done by having unicode@
and locales@ as two different lists.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Previous message: Ernest Cline: "[META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Standardize TimeZone ID"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "[locale] mailing lists? (was: Standardize TimeZone ID)"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "[locale] mailing lists? (was: Standardize TimeZone ID)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 25 2004 - 13:48:52 EDT