Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Sun Apr 25 2004 - 14:35:24 EDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: URL to Olson time zone data"

    This is a public, general purpose list. There are already many discussions of
    topics unrelated to the Unicode standard per se; just look back over your
    messages sorted by subject, and you'll see *many* of them. But we do not enforce
    what gets discussed on this list (except to within very broad limits of
    propriety).

    As I said, if this really proves to be a problem, we can split the lists.

    Mark
    __________________________________
    http://www.macchiato.com
    ► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
    To: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Sun, 2004 Apr 25 10:20
    Subject: Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

    > Ernest,
    >
    > I consider the whole "Standardize TimeZone ID" thread to have been
    > off-topic for the Unicode list. It is not about Unicode. It is about
    > locales.
    > --
    > Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 25 2004 - 15:11:12 EDT