Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> Please, Mark. You don't spend as much time on the Unicode list as I
> do. Trust me.
>
> Or trust MichKa.
>
> Either way, please make a new list for this specialized discussion area.

I add my voice to these. Please create a separate list for public
discussion of locales, or else redirect locale discussion to an existing
public list.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
The penguin geeks is happy / As under the waves they lark
The closed-source geeks ain't happy / They sad cause they in the dark
But geeks in the dark is lucky / They in for a worser treat
One day when the Borg go belly-up / Guess who wind up on the street.

• Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Variation selectors and vowel marks"
• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 25 2004 - 16:32:19 EDT