From: Jony Rosenne (rosennej@qsm.co.il)
Date: Sat May 08 2004 - 04:04:22 CDT
I don't believe "1066 and all that" style of research is relevant to these
discussions. (http://silonov.narod.ru/parents/green/1066_01.htm)
Jony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
> [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Mark E. Shoulson
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 1:27 AM
> To: unicode@unicode.org
> Subject: Re: Phoenician
>
>
> Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
>
> > Oh, this is ridiculous. "They're the same script." It's shown
> > they're not.
>
> To head off the inevitable dispute: I was speaking
> "shorthand". What I
> mean is, "They're the same script, everyone recognizes them as one
> script," and it's shown that modern readers do not consider
> them so, and
> in fact are completely clueless when shown it.
>
> ~mark
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 08 2004 - 03:07:22 CDT