From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 08:20:16 CDT
At 10:14 +0200 2004-05-15, Jony Rosenne wrote:
>Having Qamats Qatan as a regular Unicode character will have an
>effect on the majority of users who do not know or care for the
No greater than they effect that the QAMATS QATAN has on them when
they make use of one of Shlomo Tal's 1976 Seder, or Jeffrey Shiovitz'
2001 B'kol Echad.
>If anything, it should be some kind of glyph variant.
It's not a glyph variant. It's a rarely-used character, attested in
modern texts, which has its own name and shape, and which has a
different reading from QAMATS.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 15 2004 - 08:21:34 CDT