RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 12:59:16 CDT

  • Next message: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

    At 10:00 -0700 2004-05-20, Addison Phillips [wM] wrote:
    >I concur with Peter. If there are multiple
    >documents now, then I'd like to see a single
    >normative document...

    It will be the plain-text version, and for the
    purposes of fixing the current regrettable mess
    I'm taking it as read that the plain text version
    was always the normative version.

    >and furthermore I would like it to *be*
    >normative (and I'd like to know which one it
    >is). The text file is listed on the web site as
    >the "alternative"...

    It should say normative.

    Is the format order satisfactory? English_Name;Code;Nş;Nom_français;PVA;Date
    Or would it be preferable to have it in the
    format of Table 1

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 13:00:07 CDT