Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: James Kass (
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 16:04:43 CDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924 "code"s and "ID"s"

    Ernest Cline wrote,

    > > In order for Phoenician to be "disunified" from Hebrew, it must
    > > first have been unified with Hebrew. This is not the case.
    > Well then, nonunification if you wish to be picky about it.

    Sorry if I offended. Many on this list have referred to the current
    proposal as a "disunification" and seem to be arguing that accepting
    this proposal would change and disrupt current Unicoding practices.

    In this case, I think it's important to be picky because there are
    no current Unicoding practices for Phoenician. Phoenician is not
    yet encoded in the standard.

    Best regards,

    James Kass

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 16:05:33 CDT