From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 16:28:06 CDT
jameskass@att.net wrote:
> In order for Phoenician to be "disunified" from Hebrew, it must
> first have been unified with Hebrew. This is not the case.
Okay, un-unified, non-unified, kept-separate-from ... pick your term.
At the moment Phoenician is neither unified nor non-unified with Hebrew *because no
decision has been made by the UTC*. Lack of a decision neither implies unification or
non-unification. Phoenician is in the box with Schroedinger's cat.
John Hudson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 16:28:50 CDT