Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: John Hudson (
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 16:28:06 CDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924 draft fixes" wrote:

    > In order for Phoenician to be "disunified" from Hebrew, it must
    > first have been unified with Hebrew. This is not the case.

    Okay, un-unified, non-unified, kept-separate-from ... pick your term.

    At the moment Phoenician is neither unified nor non-unified with Hebrew *because no
    decision has been made by the UTC*. Lack of a decision neither implies unification or
    non-unification. Phoenician is in the box with Schroedinger's cat.

    John Hudson

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 16:28:50 CDT