From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Fri May 21 2004 - 15:11:05 CDT
Dean Snyder <dean dot snyder at jhu dot edu> wrote:
> You're missing my point. I don't really care that it's called Hebrew;
> but I suspect that OTHERS do and that is one motivation (maybe even a
> subconscious one) behind a separate Phoenician proposal.
I doubt anyone's this badly snowed by the naming conventions. I suspect
that those who want to encode Phoenician separately from Hebrew are
motivated by the belief that they are different scripts.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 21 2004 - 15:11:49 CDT