Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: James Kass (
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 14:13:30 CDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"

    Peter Kirk wrote,

    > There has now been nearly a month to gain experience on this issue.
    > During this time there have been several hundred postings related to
    > locales. In just the last two days there have been more than 100. It is
    > very tedious for those of working on character encoding issues to have
    > to receive all of this irrelevant material.

    Isn't that because reports of typographical errors and the like are
    being submitted to our public list, where they get distributed to
    some 600 plus subscribers, rather than being reported using the on-line
    form as has been suggested and which would be more appropriate?

    Best regards,

    James Kass

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 14:15:24 CDT