From: Ernest Cline (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 22:30:32 CDT
> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Everson <email@example.com>
> Here. Chew on this. :-)
> Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols
> Michael Everson
I'm not certain that a full 724 set of Dominoes is needed.
In plain text, the orientation of a domino would seem to
be a matter for the font to specify. The orientation
becomes a concern only when the dominoes are laid
out as played, and that cannot be represented in plain text.
If instead of providing all four orientations, no preferred
orientation or only a single orientation were specified,
then instead of 724 characters only 191 characters
would be required to represent the same variety of
dominoes as the proposal calls for.
It might be better to consider encoding the pips for 0 to 18.
(either in addition to or instead of the bones themselves)
Some domino sets (as shown in the proposal) use different
colors for different pip values. With the pips available as
Unicode characters, it would be trivial to use HTML and CSS
to not only create the desired dominoes out of the pips, but
place them in any desired orientation and in relation
to other dominoes for play.
It is fairly common now for standard decks to include
two distinct jokers, and if I remember correctly, there
are games which use both jokers and give them
different roles. There are even decks with more
than two jokers, altho they are hardly standard.
To quote from the website Andy's Playing Cards :
"... during the first half of the 20th century the Joker cards
became two (usually one red and one black, to match
the Bowers' colour, but sometimes one with colours and
one in black & white). Some decks now have three, or
In any case, it looks like at least one additional Joker
character will be required if playing cards are encoded,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 22:31:11 CDT