From: Dean Snyder (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 11:02:11 CDT
Michael Everson wrote at 4:01 PM on Tuesday, May 25, 2004:
>At 10:12 -0400 2004-05-25, Dean Snyder wrote:
> Michael Everson
>> >>>In any case we're encoding the significant nodes
>> >>>in your *diascript. Similarly, Swedish, Bokmål,
>> >>>Nynorsk, and Danish are distinguished, as are the
>> >>>Romance languages.
>> >>Are you saying that Swedish, Danish, and the
>>>>Romance languages are not unified in Unicode?
>>>Are you being deliberately obtuse?
>Then go back and re-read the entire context because you have got it wrong.
I have already read it and it sounds like you're saying Romance and
Scandinavian are not unified in Unicode, or as you put it "Similarly
[they] are distinguished". (And the context is about significant nodes on
a script continuum that should or should not be distinguished in separate
If I am misunderstanding you, could you please make it clearer what you
Dean A. Snyder
Assistant Research Scholar
Manager, Digital Hammurabi Project
Computer Science Department
Whiting School of Engineering
218C New Engineering Building
3400 North Charles Street
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218
office: 410 516-6850
cell: 717 817-4897
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 11:01:53 CDT