From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 12:42:36 CDT
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Behalf Of Dean Snyder
You've done an interesting, controlled test. I think you made things in
overly difficult by using all uppercase, but I'm not really interested
in critiquing the test methodology.
I'm interested in whether discussing Fraktur has any relevance for the
issue of encoding PH.
Let's say that you have adequately demonstrated that Fraktur text is not
legible to most Latin speakers. (This can be disputed since there is
some measure of legibility -- all of your subjects did recognize some
portions of the text. But I'll assume it's demonstrated.) All that this
demonstrates is that *glyphs* may not be recognizable. It does not
demonstrate that characters are distinct. For *any* script, one can
create glyphs that the average user of the script will find illegible.
I've seen Thai typefaces that I certainly had difficulty reading, but
that does not mean that the characters are not Thai. The point is that
*some* people can read such text, and they recognize those characters as
Thai, or Latin in the case of Fraktur.
The important question for character encoding is whether the needs of
users of Fraktur are best met if they are encoded as distinct
characters. For mathematicians, distinct Fraktur symbols have been
encoded. But for people using Fraktur style for German (or whatever
language) text, they will use the characters in the Basic Latin block.
That is what will best meet their needs. (If any of them *wants* to
encode text using the math symbols, that is their prerogative, but that
is not necessarily what others might recommend to them for their
The fact that people who do not regularly use Fraktur find it illegible
has no bearing whatsoever. The people who *do* use Fraktur (apart from
the mathematicians) consider it Latin and are best served by encoding
their text as Latin.
For the case of PH, we can ask questions about legibility, but there is
no need to look for analogues with Fraktur. Some people who know Hebrew
find Hebrew-language text set with PH glyphs legible, some (the vast
majority) do not. The same is true for German and Fraktur. But all that
tells us is that *perhaps* PH can be unified with square Hebrew
characters. It is not the only consideration in whether we do unify
characters, however, and the situation wrt Fraktur does not tell us
anything additional that pertains to that issue.
Can we **please** discontinue this discussion of Fraktur in relation to
making decisions about PH.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 12:44:26 CDT