From: Andrew C. West (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 09:42:24 CDT
On Fri, 28 May 2004 06:51:27 -0700, "Mark Davis" wrote:
> > As things now stand, Ogham must be wrapped in RLO...PDF brackets when
> > mixed with vertical Han or Mongolian.
> Yes, that's true -- and I don't see any reason why people can't live with
> that... Those are the kinds of reasons we have the explicit controls.
Well I for one can live with that.
It was my original contention that using directional control characters such as
RLO and PDF were an appropriate mechanism (together with a suitable RTL Ogham
font) for producing BTT Ogham embedded within TTB Mongolian. And since Mark
seems to be confirming that this is indeed correct, it is the mechanism that I
will be using on my forthcoming web page in which I prove that Ogham was
invented by time-travelling warrior monks from Mongolia.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 28 2004 - 09:43:08 CDT