Re: Revised Phoenician proposal

From: Christopher Fynn (
Date: Sun Jun 06 2004 - 17:20:14 CDT

  • Next message: D. Starner: "Re: Revised Phoenician proposal"

    Curtis Clark wrote:

    > (As a rhetorical device,) I have to say that I'm puzzled by this. All
    > I've seemed to hear from Semiticists is that Phoenician is not a
    > separate script. How, then, can these same Semiticists be the major
    > users of something that doesn't exist?
    And if they continue to encode "Phoenician" script text using Hebrew
    characters (even after any separate Phoenician characters get encoded)
    ~ which is they say they want to do (and they will always be free to do)
    ~ they will* never* be users of Unicode Phoenician script and so they
    have absolutely nothing to worry about. ;-)

    - Chris

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 06 2004 - 17:24:46 CDT