From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 09:00:47 CDT
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> Behalf Of John Cowan
> [T]he Unicode Standard does not encode idiosyncratic,
> personal, novel, or private use characters [...].
What about Bell's Visible Speech? (I'm sure I've seen it discussed here
on on qalam, but I've no recollection what might have been said.) I
don't know what Bell might have published, but they were also used by
Sweet, Henry. 1906. A primer of phonetics. 3rd edn., revised. Oxford:
Would you consider these too idiosyncratic?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 10 2004 - 09:01:48 CDT