From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 15:44:20 CDT
At 16:21 -0400 2004-06-10, email@example.com wrote:
> > You don't KNOW that. You assert that. This is the "adversarial" style
>> I was objecting to, John. Could you please take this on board?
>Fair enough, Michael. But the burden of going forward with the evidence
>is still yours. (I'll do what I can.)
I have shown (1) that they exist, (2) that they have specific usage.
I have not shown them in a second document, though I have shown that
Pullum & Ladusaw have quoted one word in Doke's orthography, spelling
it with his peculiar use of diacritics. I would be happy to find a
second use of the letters, but I consider the usefulness of being
able to cite Doke in the original to be perfectly legitimate. Let's
see what turns up in NYPL and LOC.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 10 2004 - 15:48:06 CDT