RE: User Expectations for collation (was Re: Looking for transcri ption or transliteration standards latin->arabic)

From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:26:55 CDT

  • Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: Importance of diacritics"

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
    > Behalf Of Mark Davis
    > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:21 AM

    > These provide good examples. It would be interesting to see,
    > of the people
    > on the unicode@unicode.org list, how many non-Poles would
    > expect to find the
    > following orders:
    >
    > Ab < Ąb < Ac
    > Eb < Ęb < Ec
    > Ob < Ób < Oc
    >
    > Ce < Će < Cy
    > Ne < Ńe < Ny
    > Sa < Śa < Sy
    > Za < Źa < Zy
    > Za < Ża < Zy
    >
    > and either (a) or (b):
    >
    > a) La < Ła < Ly // interleaved
    > b) La < Ly < Ła // non-interleaved

            You missed the most important thing: the Polish alphabet. I expect
    letters to be separated and modifiers to be interfiled in any language. Not
    knowing which are the letters and which are the modifiers, I can have no
    real expectations, or at least none with any merit.

    /|/|ike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 14:27:41 CDT