Re: Importance of diacritics

From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:26:24 CDT

  • Next message: Addison Phillips [wM]: "W3C I18N rechartering: input invited"

    That is a red herring. Whether or not two characters are distinct in NFD --
    or NFC -- is completely orthogonal to whether they are considered a single
    unit in various processes, such as collation, searching, and matching.

    ‎Mark

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk@qaya.org>
    To: "Alexander Savenkov" <savenkov@xmlhack.ru>
    Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 06:04
    Subject: Re: Importance of diacritics

    > On 15/07/2004 13:21, Alexander Savenkov wrote:
    >
    > > ...
    > >
    > >>By contrast, и and й are not interfiled.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >I can’t see why you put these as an example. They are completely
    > >different letters (vowel and consonant), notwithstanding their similar
    > >look. ...
    > >
    >
    > I used these as an example because in Unicode й canonically decomposes
    > to и and breve, just like ё canonically decomposes to е plus diaeresis
    > (or umlaut? not sure what German bibliographers would make of this one),
    > and a diacritic folding would automatically fold й with и as well as ё
    > with е. I presume the former folding would be unacceptable to Russians,
    > at least in some contexts.
    >
    > --
    > Peter Kirk
    > peter@qaya.org (personal)
    > peterkirk@qaya.org (work)
    > http://www.qaya.org/
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 15 2004 - 11:27:27 CDT