Re: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence

• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
• In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence"
• Next in thread: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk scripsit:

> Anyway, is Yiddish in fact never written completely unpointed? That
> would surprise me.

It might have happened at some point, but the standard (YIVO) Yiddish
orthography would become illegible if points were stripped.

-- 
Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.reutershealth.com
is interaction.  --Richard Feynman      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence"
• Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Writing Tatar using the Latin script; new characters to encode?"
• In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence"
• Next in thread: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Folding algorithm and canonical equivalence"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 18 2004 - 20:43:14 CDT