Re: Unicode & Shorthand?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Sep 22 2004 - 14:34:21 CDT

  • Next message: James Kass: "Plane One fonts"

    At 19:49 +0100 2004-09-21, Timothy Partridge wrote:

    >Some abbreviations (about twenty?) did have more common use and there are
    >many 19th century UK books published in "record type" which reproduce
    >ancient records. Many of the abbreviations don't have a unique expansion so
    >converting into expanded plain text loses the original ambiguity.

    Correct, and work is ongoing to encode them. If you have references
    please forward them to me.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 22 2004 - 14:37:23 CDT