RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 19:54:02 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"

    > From: []
    On Behalf
    > Of James Kass

    > Code2000 does not contain Tibetan glyphs. But, Code2000 *is*
    > an OpenType font and has *many* OpenType tables in it

    It has exactly 3 OpenType-specific tables in it -- in the sense of the
    top-level tables that are listed in the table directory. Is that many?

    Mind you, the version that I have has a fair number of features and
    lookups -- 65 in GSUB. (Interesting: they're only Type 1 and Type 4
    substitutions - nothing contextual!)

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 19:54:45 CST