From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 14 2005 - 18:53:50 CST
At 14:52 -0800 2005-01-14, Peter Constable wrote:
>The description of Tibetan in Daniels & Bright says (p. 435), "bar
>tsheg... serves to separate syllables..." That differs from the
>paragraph quoted above from TUS4 which suggests that it is used between
>words. Which is correct (or closer to correct)?
The distinction between syllable and word is as fuzzy in Tibetan as
it is in Thai.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 14 2005 - 19:02:04 CST