Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8

From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 08:35:51 CST

  • Next message: Lars Kristan: "RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"

    Hans Aberg wrote:

    >On 2005/01/20 09:40, Arcane Jill at arcanejill@ramonsky.com wrote:
    >
    >
    >>>The problem is that platforms such as UNIX use different methods to
    >>>determine file encodings that file contents, and there are other problems
    >>>with it, see <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>I am not clear why you keep citing this web page. It is not definitive. This
    >>one is: http://www.unicode.org.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >The webpage you mention s perhaps definitive to Unicode.
    >

    I thought Unicode was indeed what we were discussing on this list.

    ~mark

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 08:36:35 CST