From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 14:46:52 CST
On 2005/01/20 15:35, Mark E. Shoulson at email@example.com wrote:
>> On 2005/01/20 09:40, Arcane Jill at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>>> The problem is that platforms such as UNIX use different methods to
>>>> determine file encodings that file contents, and there are other problems
>>>> with it, see <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html>
>>> I am not clear why you keep citing this web page. It is not definitive. This
>>> one is: http://www.unicode.org.
>> The webpage you mention s perhaps definitive to Unicode.
> I thought Unicode was indeed what we were discussing on this list.
Hopefully. But hopefully Unicode should also be used for something, like
representing characyers in computers for example, and that ought to be
essential for Unicode discussions as well. Or what do you think?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 14:50:25 CST