From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 14:47:04 CST
On 2005/01/20 17:34, Rick McGowan at email@example.com wrote:
>> It is hard to make UNIX processes becoming Unicode Conformant Processes
>> when the BOM requirement is present.
> Hmmm... I don't recall that the Unicode Standard ever specifies that the
> Byte Order Mark is *required* to be used anywhere for any purpose. Can you
> point me to the place in the standard where this is stated?
Several poster have cliamed that, most recently Arcane Jill. Check with
them. There is supposed to be a difference between a UTF-8 encoding not
requiring a BOM and a UTF-8 process requiring it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 14:50:33 CST