From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2005 - 05:01:03 CST
At 01:12 -0500 2005-02-14, Patrick Andries wrote:
>Are you considering such set of confusables for
>Italic/Cherokee/Coptic/..., how large a set then? Maintaining such a
>list of universal confusables seems like a lot of work, and by some
>aspects very subjective.
I agree, this is out of our scope, I think. It is "apologetic" and we
already get attacked enough for this "security problem".
I mean, really. IDN is for, among others, the Chinese. Who is going
to maintain the "list of confusables" for Extension B and Extension
C1 and all?
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 14 2005 - 05:04:39 CST