Ezh or yogh?

From: vlad (emperor.vlad@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 01 2005 - 06:15:07 CST

Next message: UList@dfa-mail.com: "Re: OT Language System Tags (Was: Re: E0000 Language Tags for Archaic Greek Alphabets)"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: OT Language System Tags (Was: Re: E0000 Language Tags for Archaic Greek Alphabets)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Ezh or yogh?"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Ezh or yogh?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In some older texts concerned with historical linguistics (see
http://penguin.pearson.swarthmore.edu/~scrist1/scanned_books/png/goth_wright/b0054.png
(second table) for an example), a symbol looking like ezh is used to
represent a voiced velar fricative—a not untypical value for yogh.
Should this be encoded as LATIN SMALL LETTER EZH, or considered a
glyph variant of LATIN SMALL LETTER YOGH?

Next message: UList@dfa-mail.com: "Re: OT Language System Tags (Was: Re: E0000 Language Tags for Archaic Greek Alphabets)"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: OT Language System Tags (Was: Re: E0000 Language Tags for Archaic Greek Alphabets)"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Ezh or yogh?"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Ezh or yogh?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 06:17:37 CST