From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 11:56:15 CST
> From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peterkirk@qaya.org]
> The accepted proposal for HOLAM HASER FOR VAV does change the meaning
of
> existing data, from correctly spelled to a spelling error.
No; the existing character is ambiguous in usage contexts where no
distinction is made: it is "holam", not "holam male". Existing data
cannot have made a distinction as there was no separate character with
which to make any distinction. That data is just as valid as it ever
was.
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 02 2005 - 11:58:17 CST