Re: U+0023

From: Johannes Bergerhausen (
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:24:11 CST

  • Next message: Andrew C. West: "Re: U+0023"

    Am 01.04.2005 um 02:10 schrieb Michael Everson:

    > It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not "really" the right
    > character for the second part of the Numero sign. In my view either
    > U+1D52 or Masculine Ordinal would be preferable (if the latter has no
    > underbar, since U+02E2 has no underbar).

     From the typographic point of view, it is very clear:
    U+00B0 Degree Sign is a small circle.
    U+00BA Masculine Ordinal Indicator is a superscript latin small o.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:27:49 CST