From: Johannes Bergerhausen (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:24:11 CST
Am 01.04.2005 um 02:10 schrieb Michael Everson:
> It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not "really" the right
> character for the second part of the Numero sign. In my view either
> U+1D52 or Masculine Ordinal would be preferable (if the latter has no
> underbar, since U+02E2 has no underbar).
From the typographic point of view, it is very clear:
U+00B0 Degree Sign is a small circle.
U+00BA Masculine Ordinal Indicator is a superscript latin small o.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 02:27:49 CST