Re: U+0023

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 04:44:27 CST

  • Next message: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Re: U+0023"

    At 10:24 +0200 2005-04-01, Johannes Bergerhausen wrote:
    >Am 01.04.2005 um 02:10 schrieb Michael Everson:
    >>It does suggest that the DEGREE sign is not
    >>"really" the right character for the second
    >>part of the Numero sign. In my view either
    >>U+1D52 or Masculine Ordinal would be preferable
    >>(if the latter has no underbar, since U+02E2
    >>has no underbar).
    >From the typographic point of view, it is very clear:
    >U+00B0 Degree Sign is a small circle.
    >U+00BA Masculine Ordinal Indicator is a superscript latin small o.

    This is obvious, and not in dispute. The question
    is what should be used with N to form the Numero,
    N or N? French rules of typography say the
    latter, but if superscript s is used in the
    plural, it would seem that that rule is, well,

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 04:47:42 CST