From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:14:55 CST
At 07:05 +0100 2005-04-01, Sinnathurai Srivas wrote:
>Visarga's properties are vastly or totally different to the
>functions of Aytham.
>Also please see below, a simple abstract of what Aytham is.
>1/ The main function of Aytham: (Here h=Aytham, q=Aytham, x=any
>consonant) It modulates consonants to give Ahenumised and Aqenumised
(These terms are not English.)
>such as: kh, mh, ... xh, kq, mq, ... xq
>(Note: In Devanagari these are individual letters and in Unicode
>these are Devanagari Characters (such as kh, mh, ...xh) such as: hk,
>hm, ... hx, qk, qm, ....qx (I do not know about the equivalant in
Yes. Aytham is used to show aspirate consonants because the Tamil
script lost these.
Aytham has three circles. Tamil Grantha Visarga has two circles. The
visarga indicates an aspiration of a vowel, specifically, an original
Sanskrit -s which became -h.
It is improbable that the Aytham is unrelated to the Tamil Grantha
Visarga. Or to put it positively, it is probable that the Aytham is
related to the Tamil Grantha Visarga.
>Character names are very respectable and has immense value. Grammar
>is something passionate to mostly all languages. Character names are
I like character names a lot, as many readers of this list will know.
Nevertheless, they are not intended to be encyclopaedic, and it is
known that many are imperfect.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 05:17:03 CST