Re: String name and Character Name

From: Sinnathurai Srivas (sisrivas@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:17:33 CST

  • Next message: David Starner: "Re: String name and Character Name"

    If you read my mail properly you would find that I do not mean UC as
    oppressor.

    String names are originally selected for meaning. They have meaning.

    Sinnathurai Srivas

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jon Hanna" <jon@hackcraft.net>
    To: "'Sinnathurai Srivas'" <sisrivas@blueyonder.co.uk>; "'N. Ganesan'"
    <naa.ganesan@gmail.com>; "'Unicode List'" <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 10:43 AM
    Subject: RE: String name and Character Name

    >> calling a name
    >> with intent to oppress is not acceptable.
    >
    > I'm sure many of us would be very interested to see how you can document
    > such an intent on the part of the Unicode Consortium.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Jon Hanna
    > Work: <http://www.selkieweb.com/>
    > Play: <http://www.hackcraft.net/>
    > Chat: <irc://irc.freenode.net/selkie>
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 11 2005 - 19:18:22 CST