Re: String name and Character Name

From: Mark E. Shoulson (
Date: Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:05:48 CST

  • Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: String name and Character Name"

    Sinnathurai Srivas wrote:

    > If you read my mail properly you would find that I do not mean UC as
    > oppressor.
    > String names are originally selected for meaning. They have meaning.
    It doesn't pay to argue this point: even if you are 100% completely
    absolutely positively right, the names *will* *not* *be* *changed*. It
    can't happen, they're fixed and unchanging, even if they are horribly
    wrong. So it's pointless to keep trying to accomplish the impossible,
    when even convincing everyone that you are correct won't get it done.
    Concentrate on fixing what *can* be fixed and getting the explanatory
    text as good as possible.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 08:07:10 CST