From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 14:10:43 CDT
At 19:43 +0100 2005/06/02, Jon Hanna wrote:
>Hans Aberg wrote:
>>It seems me that, when considering a new glyph, one should strive
>>to figure if there is any semantic value to it; if not, it should
>>probably not be added.
>
>Hans, what the hell are you talking about?
Sorry, I do not see what you are hinting at here.
>Seriously, have even read the Standard this list discusses?
No. It is better if you quote the sections that you think relevant,
and give your interpretations of it. For example, I twice pointed out
to BS that he was wrong about the C++ standard, in a friendly and
courteous manner, of course. Since you view yourself better in this
respect than principle designers of major computer languages, I
suggest you show off your abilities a little more.
-- Hans Aberg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 02 2005 - 14:11:48 CDT