Re: Ligatures fi and ffi

From: Hans Aberg (
Date: Thu Jun 02 2005 - 17:55:35 CDT

  • Next message: Sarasvati: "Banter by any other name would bore as much"

    At 23:09 +0100 2005/06/02, Jon Hanna wrote:
    >Hans Aberg wrote:
    >>At 19:43 +0100 2005/06/02, Jon Hanna wrote:
    >>>Hans Aberg wrote:
    >>>>It seems me that, when considering a new glyph, one should strive
    >>>>to figure if there is any semantic value to it; if not, it should
    >>>>probably not be added.
    >>>Hans, what the hell are you talking about?
    >>Sorry, I do not see what you are hinting at here.
    >That your suggestion has zero relevance to this list.

    It seems you have misunderstood the context. So an explanation of
    your comments are in place.

       Hans Aberg

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 02 2005 - 17:57:47 CDT